Obama's work edicts could kill businesses on military bases
The fight over the minimum wage, which President Obama and Democrats hope to make a centerpiece of
this year's midterm elections, comes down to two simple arguments. Obama
says low-income working Americans deserve a raise, while Republicans say raising
the minimum wage would cost jobs.
It was a mostly theoretical argument until Feb. 12, when Obama signed an
executive order raising the minimum wage for employees of federal contractors to
$10.10 an hour from $7.25. "This will make a difference for folks," Obama said
at a White
House signing ceremony. "Right now, there's a dishwasher at Randolph Air
Force Base in Texas
making $7.76 an hour -- $7.76 an hour. There's a fast-food worker at Andrews,
right down the street, making $8.91 an hour. There's a laundry worker at Camp
Dodge in Iowa making $9.03 an hour. Once I sign this order, starting
next year, as their contracts come up, each of them and many of their fellow
coworkers are going to get a raise."
Obama's order does not take effect until January 1, 2015. But there are signs
it is already having an effect -- and it is not what the president and his party
said it would be.
In late March, the publication Military Times reported that three McDonald's fast-food
restaurants, plus one other lesser-known food outlet, will soon close at Navy
bases, while other national-name chains have "asked to be released from their
Army and Air Force Exchange Service contracts to operate fast-food restaurants
at two other installations."
Military Times quoted sources saying the closures are related to the coming
mandatory wage increases, with one source saying they are "the tip of the
iceberg."
The closures, real and contemplated, are a serious concern to 40 Republican
members of the House Armed Services and Education and Workforce committees, who
this month wrote Labor Secretary Thomas Perez asking that the mandatory increase not apply to
some businesses on military bases.
"Should these policy changes be fully implemented, we are concerned they will
eliminate jobs, negatively impact recreational services on military bases, and
limit the dining options for servicemen and women on military installations,"
the lawmakers wrote.
The administration is making it very expensive to do business on military
bases, and not just because of the minimum wage. Under federal contracting law,
some businesses operating on military installations must also pay their workers
something called a health and welfare payment, which last year was $2.56 an hour
but which the administration has now raised to $3.81 an hour.
In the past, fast-food employers did not have to pay the health and welfare
payment, but last fall the Obama Labor Department ruled that they must. So add $3.81 per
hour, per employee to the employers' cost. And then add Obama's $2.85 an hour
increase in the minimum wage. Together, employers are looking at paying $6.66
more per hour, per employee. That's a back-breaking burden. (Just for good
measure, the administration also demanded such employers provide paid holidays
and vacation time.)
And one more thing. Military contracting laws do not allow businesses to
raise their prices above the level prevailing in the local community. The
fast-food operators can't charge more to make up their losses.
One group perhaps most concerned about the administration's increases is the
military itself. Earlier this month, Russell Beland, who is deputy assistant
secretary of the Navy for military manpower and personnel, wrote a letter to the
Labor Department asking for relief for fast food contractors.
"Given the business model typical in the fast food industry, this increase in
the cost of labor dramatically disrupts the profitability and viability of food
service operators" on military bases, Beland wrote. "The increased labor burden
resulting from the new [wage structure] eliminates any profit the operator might
otherwise realize and puts him in an impossible business dilemma."
Beland wrote that Navy exchange officials estimate that 390 fast-food
concessions in the U.S. and territories will close because of the increased
costs. "Closure of these facilities would result in loss of work for nearly
5,750 contracted concession employees who are currently gainfully employed,"
Beland wrote.
And that's just for the Navy and Marines. The Army exchange system is much
bigger, and including the Air Force, could affect as many as 10,000 more
jobs.
The Obama administration knows it is placing a massive burden on businesses
that operate on military bases. A few days ago, the Labor Department temporarily
rescinded some of the new costs while it "re-evaluates" its actions. But
President Obama's executive order is still there, waiting to go into effect.
Under any conceivable scenario, Obama's edict, combined with his
administration's policies, will place unbearable new burdens on businesses at
military bases and, yes, result in fewer jobs. It looks like the president's
critics were right.